Up until now the only way to make guns was with a very elaborate setup and a permit to actually make firearms. Now almost any person with a 3D printer can print off their own right? Well, not exactly. In the article Solid Concepts, the Texas based company who built the gun, state that "industry-grade DMLS machines cost[ing] hundreds of thousands of dollars" would be necessary to produce the gun. So that eliminates most of the population from misusing this technology. But what about organized groups with much larger budgets?
As an industrial engineer this is a real tipping point for me. Most of what we do is aimed at making things cheaper and more accessible to the public. From a technical perspective this breakthrough is quite impressive. Most previous attempts to build a metal gun with 3D printing ended in dramatic failure, due mostly to parts that weren't strong enough. That is exactly what the Solid Concepts team set out to dispel. And dispel they did, the gun worked very well.
The technology behind this new gun is no doubt something to marvel at. Almost literally building something atom by atom is quite astonishing. However, I believe we need be very careful with this technology. While it is impossible to stop all misuse of 3D printing, something needs to be done to make sure that tragedies are minimal. So while part of me is amazed that we have come to the point in technology where applications like this are possible, my instincts are that this could turn sour without some comprehensive regulation.
3D printing is a very interesting topic. I definitely think that 3D guns ghouls not be allowed to be made. The video was a helpful visual to show what the 3D gun can do. Headers for the paragraphs would help explain what each paragraph is about. A claim to show that either this article was effective or ineffective using ethos, pathos, or logos would help.
ReplyDelete